Joint website of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of the BRICS member States
Brazil
Luis Inacio Lula da Silva
The President of Brazil
Russia
Vladimir Putin
President of the Russian Federation
India
Narendra Modi
Prime Minister of India
Сhina
Xi Jinping
President of the People's Republic of China
South Africa
Cyril Ramaphosa
The President of South Africa
Egypt
Abdel Fattah el-Sisi
President of Egypt
Ethiopia
Abiy Ahmed Ali
Prime Minister of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Iran
Massoud Pezeshkian
The President of Iran
Saudi Arabia
Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia
UAE
Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan
President of the UAE
Europe's energy supply in danger
Friday, May 17, 2024

Patrick Poppel, expert at the Center for Geostrategic Studies (Belgrade)

In the 21st century, we are not only living in the age of digitalization, but also in the age of energy supply. Due to the high standard of industrialization, Europe is particularly affected by this reality.

Although the sanctions against Russia have fundamentally failed, this policy is still being pursued. The measures against energy supplies in particular are causing massive damage to Europe.

Gas from America is much more expensive than Russian gas. Russian oil, which is purchased via transit countries, is also no longer particularly cheap. All these developments are damaging the European economy and are responsible for companies leaving Europe.  This is particularly evident in Germany.

By 2023, Ukraine no longer wants to transport gas to Europe, even though there are existing contracts between Russia and the individual European states. This situation is simply not being questioned, even though Europe is sending billions to Ukraine. There is also no major committee of inquiry into the blowing up of North Stream 2, even though this would be necessary. In addition, there is a desire to switch to green energy without being able to provide the power required to supply Europe with energy in the long term with the current technology. It can therefore be said that European energy policy is in a difficult situation.

Green fantasies, incompetent politicians and economic reality come together and the result is chaos.

It is clear to see that many things in Europe are turning negative. This has already been noticed by ordinary people. Companies are most affected by the economic changes, as they are dependent on cheap raw materials and energy. They are then no longer competitive and are losing orders internationally. The result is a change in the socio-economic situation due to unemployment. We are currently hearing about the closure of companies in Germany every week. 

It is interesting to note that some of these companies are emigrating to the USA. So it is very clear who benefits from this situation. In addition, it is becoming increasingly difficult for German companies to assert themselves against their competitor China. From an economic point of view, the winners in this competition are the USA and China. But what is the solution to this problem? Should the structures of the European Union be expanded to create a European superstate that can assert itself against the USA and perhaps also against China, or should the interests of the nation states be promoted?

Many voices are already claiming that the European project has failed. The Ukraine conflict in particular has shown that Europe is not a unified force. We saw the same thing with the refugee crisis in 2015. Whether sanctions or the acceptance of refugees - many countries are not prepared to go along with the European Union's course. But one thing is clear; energy policy issues must be discussed at a national level because they affect a country's essential security interests. It was a big mistake to discuss these issues at European level. The issue of sanctions should also be a matter that should not be subject to collectivity.

The current political chaos that we are seeing in Europe clearly shows us how weak the European Union really is. If new forces do not come to power in Europe soon, the economic decline will also be unstoppable. But perhaps times need to get even worse for people to learn how important it is not to be passive in political life. The politicians' bad decisions have caused long-term damage to the European economy. It remains to be seen how long it will take to correct this situation.

The passivity of business towards politics is particularly alarming. The question must be asked as to why the individual companies and business associations did not take any action against the sanctions policy. Did those responsible in the economy not realize that they would be the victims of the sanctions? Economists could have predicted the current situation years ago, as these companies plan for the long term. How could so many mistakes be made in the strategic sector of the economy? Unfortunately, this development continues, as nothing is being done about fantastic energy supply projects, even in the area of climate hysteria.

Do these people really believe that green energy can adequately supply heavy industry? How many wind turbines do you have to install in Germany to supply the steel industry with energy? So we clearly know that the sanctions policy and climate policy are moving further and further away from reality. Ideology has no place in economic issues. But it looks like this is seen somewhat differently in Europe. It can certainly be argued that ideologies and political mistakes are responsible for the decline of the economy in Europe.

No matter what changes come in the next few years, Europe will take a very long time to recover from these undesirable developments. But if we take a closer look at the situation, we can assume that there will be further mistakes, which will also affect other areas of politics. The examples mentioned also show that most European politicians are incapable of learning. Political mistakes are no longer corrected, even if they have had serious consequences. In most cases, attempts are made to distract attention from the mistakes made with various campaigns. As the media are under strong government control, this is usually very successful.

Share